AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LU YANG TONG, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered June 20, 1995, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his guilty plea should be set aside because a language barrier inhibited his understanding of the proceedings. However, to the extent that the defendant claims that he did not understand the plea allocution because of his inability to speak English, his claims are unpreserved for appellate review in the absence of a motion to withdraw his plea ( see, People v. Marrero, 162 A.D.2d 419; People v. Looney, 111 A.D.2d 934; see also, People v. Valdivia, 198 A.D.2d 246). The defendant's contentions that his plea should be vacated due to ineffective assistance of counsel are likewise unpreserved for appellate review in the absence of a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to CPL 220.60 ( People v. Sierre, 173 A.D.2d 211).

In any event, the record belies the defendant's contentions. His plea, following a detailed allocution through an interpreter, was clearly knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TONG
(Apr 28, 1997)