DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as granted the plaintiff preliminary injunctive relief is dismissed as academic in view of the disposition of the cross appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision denying the plaintiff's motion for a Yellowstone injunction and by substituting therefor a provision granting that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff satisfied the requisite criteria for entitlement to a Yellowstone injunction ( see, First Natl. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, 21 N.Y.2d 630) by demonstrating that (1) it holds a commercial lease on the premises, (2) it was served by the defendant with a notice of default, notice to cure, or threat of termination of the lease, (3) it timely moved for injunctive relief prior to the expiration of the cure period and termination of the lease, and (4) it has the desire and ability to cure its alleged default by any means short of vacating the premises ( see generally, Long Is. Gynecological Servs. v. 1103 Stewart Ave. Assocs., 224 A.D.2d 591; 225 E. 36th St. Garage Corp. v. 221 E. 36th Owners Corp., 211 A.D.2d 420). Specifically, with regard to the second criterion, the plaintiff established that the "notice of cancellation" served upon it qualified as a notice of default, notice to cure, or threat of termination. Construing the clear and unambiguous language of the subject lease so as to give full effect to the parties' expressed intent ( see, Singh v. Dyckman, 202 A.D.2d 412), we find that the plaintiff had a clear contractual right to cure within 30 days after being given notice of termination based on the alleged substantial vacancy of the premises. Furthermore, we find that the amount of the undertaking fixed by the court does not constitute an improvident exercise of discretion, and we continue that undertaking with regard to the plaintiff's Yellowstone injunction.
In view of the foregoing, the defendant's appeal from that portion of the order granting the plaintiff a preliminary injunction has been rendered academic, since the plaintiff has established its right to the greater relief afforded by a Yellowstone injunction.