DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he is entitled to a new trial because the People failed to provide him with notice, pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10, that the complainant's stolen telephone calling card, recovered from the defendant upon his arrest, was returned to the complainant prior to trial. Absent prejudice or a showing that the statutory violation was intentional or in bad faith, reversal is not warranted ( see, People v. Watkins, 239 A.D.2d 448; People v. Siriani, 216 A.D.2d 595; People v. Dent, 183 A.D.2d 723).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.