SACCA v. SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC, N.Y. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Dollinger, Gonski Grossman, Carle Place, N.Y. (Matthew Dollinger of counsel), for appellants. Rivkin, Radler Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Stephen J. Smirti, James F. Stewart, and Michael P. Versichelli of counsel), for respondent Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Dollinger, Gonski Grossman, Carle Place, N.Y. (Matthew Dollinger of counsel), for appellants. Rivkin, Radler Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Stephen J. Smirti, James F. Stewart, and Michael P. Versichelli of counsel), for respondent Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Michael J. Sacca, d/b/a Sacca Associates International Real Estate, et al., appellants, v. Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the appellants engaged in frivolous conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c).

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.