DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant failed to rebut the plaintiff's prima facie showing that jurisdiction had been obtained in the underlying action in the State of Oregon in which the Circuit Court, Malheur County, entered a judgment against the defendant upon his default in appearing or answering. The process server's affidavit, which indicated that the defendant was personally served, constituted prima facie evidence of proper service under Oregon law (see, Baker v. Foy, 797 P.2d 349). The defendant's conclusory denial of service was insufficient to rebut the veracity or content of the affidavit (see, Simmons First Natl. Bank v. Mandracchia, 248 A.D.2d 375; Dolec Consultants, Inc., v. Lancer Litho Packaging Corp., 245 A.D.2d 415; Remington Investments, Inc. v. Seiden, 240 A.D.2d 647; Manhattan Sav. Bank v. Kohen, 231 A.D.2d 499). The discrepancies between the defendant's actual age and height and the process server's description of the individual he served are minimal (see, Simmons First Natl. Bank v. Mandracchia, supra). The defendant's contention that enforcing the Oregon judgment would be against public policy is without merit. Review of a foreign judgment is limited to determining whether the court that issued the judgment had jurisdiction. If jurisdiction was properly obtained, the defendant's default in the foreign state will not nullify the res judicata effect of the judgment (see, Ionescu v. Brancoveanu, 246 A.D.2d 414; see also, Schulz v. Barrows, 263 A.D.2d 565).
MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.