DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment and order are affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of murder in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on the charge of murder in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).
The defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction was properly denied. The defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the evidence submitted on the motion could not have been produced at the trial with due diligence or that the evidence was such that it would probably change the result if a new trial were granted (see People v. Latella, 112 A.D.2d 321).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, FEUERSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.