DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' assertions, "[a] party has an absolute, unqualified right to terminate a contract on notice pursuant to an unconditional termination clause without court inquiry into whether the termination was activated by an ulterior motive" ( Big Apple Car v. City of New York, 204 A.D.2d 109, 111; see A.J. Temple Marble Tile v. Long Is. R.R., 256 A.D.2d 526). Since the unconditional cancellation clause permitted the defendants to cancel the contract for any reason, the cancellation was authorized by the parties' contract and did not constitute an actionable breach ( see A.J. Temple Marble Tile v. Long Is. R.R., supra; J.D.'s Tire Battery Ctr. v. Automobile Club of N.Y., 255 A.D.2d 361; Big Apple Car v. City of New York, supra).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or are without merit.
FLORIO, J.P., FRIEDMANN, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.