AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94). The credible evidence disproved defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. The element of serious physical injury (Penal Law § 10.00) was established by evidence that the victim suffered a severe and potentially life-threatening stab wound to his chest that penetrated the muscle and caused blood to accumulate between his chest wall and lung, which had to be drained. He was kept in the hospital for observation for three days, and has two permanent scars on his chest ( see People v. House, 278 A.D.2d 244, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 784; People v. Gordon, 257 A.D.2d 533, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 899).

Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no basis for reversal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ
(Dec 18, 2003)