AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. TIMIKA REYNOLDS, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw her plea without conducting a hearing or assigning new counsel ( see People v. Anderson, 284 A.D.2d 544, 545). The defendant's reliance on People v. Wilson ( 15 N.Y.2d 634) is misplaced in that the basis for denying the defendant's motion appears on the face of the record of her plea allocation.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, TOWNES, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. REYNOLDS
(Feb 17, 2004)