The verdict is supported by the weight of the evidence. The record establishes that defendant City did not have a reasonable amount of time to clear the sidewalk of the icy condition that developed in the hours before the accident and caused plaintiff's fall ( see Valentine v. City of New York, 86 A.D.2d 381, affd 57 N.Y.2d 932). Further, the record shows that defendant Housing Authority had cleared the sidewalk of ice the evening before the accident and performed no further snow removal before the accident ( see Paula v. City of New York, 249 A.D.2d 100). Plaintiff's meteorologist's opinion, that defendants' snow removal operations over the course of the week preceding the accident caused partially melted snow to dam up and re-freeze on the sidewalk between parallel ridges of removed snow on either side of the sidewalk, was supported only by photographs of the area taken in the aftermath of the accident, and was properly precluded as lacking adequate factual foundation ( see Orr v. Spring, 288 A.D.2d 663, 665; Wimbush v. City of Albany, 285 A.D.2d 706, 707). In view of the foregoing, plaintiff's other claims need not be reached.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.