The order was clearly a contempt finding against defendant for failure to comply with a prior unconditional court order to issue privatized stock to plaintiffs ( see Blutreich v. Amalgamated Dwellings, Inc., 298 A.D.2d 185, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 501). Accordingly, legal fees were properly recoverable by plaintiffs pursuant to Judiciary Law § 773 ( see Holskin v. 22 Prince St. Assocs., 178 A.D.2d 347).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.