AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID BURR, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Ser

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner, an inmate at a maximum security correctional facility, was placed in protective custody at his request. Based upon his protective custody status, petitioner was submitted for a transfer. The transfer was denied due to the vicious nature of the crime for which he was convicted — which involved stabbing the murder victim 168 times. Supreme Court subsequently dismissed petitioner's CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his transfer and this appeal ensued.

Notwithstanding petitioner's assertion that, in accordance with 7 NYCRR part 330, he should be placed in a security facility with a lower classification and closer to his family in order to facilitate his transition back into the general population, it is well settled that an inmate has no right to select the correctional facility at which he or she will be incarcerated (see Matter of Greg v. Scully, 108 A.D.2d 748, 749, lv denied 65 N.Y.2d 601). Moreover, petitioner has demonstrated no circumstances warranting this Court's interference with respondent's broad discretion regarding petitioner's transfer to another facility regardless of his protective custody status (see Matter of Partee v. Bennett, 253 A.D.2d 950; Matter of Inman v. Coughlin, 131 A.D.2d 900).

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF BURR v. GOORD
(Jun 17, 2004)