AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ELISA E. BREIDING et al., Appellants, v. DAVID GILADI et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court's order, which was issued before the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Brill v. City of New York ( 2 NY3d 648), erroneously granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The motion was made more than two months after the statutory deadline (i.e., 120 days from the date the note of issue was filed) ( see CPLR 3212 [a]), and the defendants' perfunctory claims of unspecified clerical inadvertence and reassignment of counsel were insufficient to constitute good cause for the delay ( see Miceli v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 NY3d 725; Brill v. City of New York, supra; Sanango v. Generoso, 13 AD3d 349; Gibbs v. McRide Cab Co., 10 AD3d 671; Thompson v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 10 AD3d 650).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BREIDING v. GILADI
(Feb 14, 2005)