AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DOUGLAS SHINDLER et al., Respondents, v. ARVIN WARF et al., Defendants, and CENTRAL WATER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION, INC., Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Sullivan County based upon "the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice" (CPLR 510). The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence to establish the necessary criteria to demonstrate entitlement to that relief ( see O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). The affidavits of the prospective witnesses failed to disclose their addresses, and the nature and materiality of their anticipated testimony ( see Darcy v. Adco Elec., 303 AD2d 359; Fernandes v. Lawrence, 290 AD2d 412; Romero v. Mitchelltown Apts., 281 AD2d 612).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHINDLER v. WARF
(Dec 5, 2005)