AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

NEVADA PERSHING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; NEVADA CEMENT COMPANY; and, DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

LARRY HICKS, District Judge

Defendant Nevada Cement Company, through its undersigned counsel, Michael G. Chapman, P.C., and Plaintiff Nevada Pershing, LLC, through its undersigned counsel, Kurt A. Franke of the Law Offices of Kurt A. Franke stipulate and agree to extend the time from February 27, 2006, to and including March 13, 2006 for Defendant to file and serve its reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. Previously, Plaintiff granted Defendant a 15 day extension to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, and Defendant granted a 17 day extension to Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The reasons for the extension include additional time to allow Defendant to address issues raised in the opposition, as well as due to Defendant's counsel's trial schedule in another matter. This stipulation also requests the court to approve all extensions granted by and between the parties to date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEVADA PERSHING, LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR (D.Nev. 2006)
(Mar 6, 2006)