AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SHERMAN P. HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MAHONEY, Warden, Montana State Prison; WILLIAM SLAUGHTER, Director; DR. ROAN; and PAUL LUCIER, Defendants.

ORDER

DONALD MOLLOY, Chief Judge

United States Magistrate Carolyn S. Ostby entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter on July 27, 2006. Plaintiff Hawkins did not file objections and is therefore not entitled to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

It is Judge Ostby's recommendation that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in full and judgment should be entered in favor of Defendants. I agree.

I find no clear error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendation (dkt #38) and I adopt them in full. Summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendants and the Clerk shall enter Judgment on Defendants' behalf.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAWKINS v. MAHONEY
(Sep 5, 2006)