Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF TODD M. TAYLOR AND MICHELLE L. TAYLOR. Upon the Petition of TODD M. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning MICHELLE L. TAYLOR, Respondent-Appellee.

VAITHESWARAN, J.

This appeal requires us to consider the doctrine of mootness. Lewis Inv., Inc. v. City of Iowa City, 703 N.W.2d 180, 183 (Iowa 2005) (quoting State v. Hernandez-Lopez, 639 N.W.2d 226, 234 (Iowa 2002)) ("Ordinarily, an appeal is deemed moot if the issue becomes nonexistent or academic and, consequently no longer involves a justiciable controversy."). Although the appellee has not raised this doctrine, we may consider the issue on our own motion. In re Troester's Estate, 331 N.W.2d 123, 127 (Iowa 1983). In doing so, we may resort to matters outside the record. Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCarthy, 572 N.W.2d 537, 540 n. 1 (Iowa 1997).

Todd Taylor filed a dissolution petition. Michelle Taylor countered with a petition for relief from domestic abuse. The district court entered a temporary protective order, which was to remain in effect "until modified, terminated or superseded by a later written order, until the case is dismissed, or until a decree is issued in this dissolution." Todd appealed that order.

After the notice of appeal was filed, Michelle sought and obtained a dismissal of the temporary protection order. Recently, the district court also filed a dissolution decree. Both events render Todd's appeal moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE MARRIAGE OF TAYLOR
(Nov 16, 2006)