Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement placed on the record in open court. Generally, "[stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not to be lightly set aside, especially where, as here, the part[ies] seeking to vacate the stipulation [were] represented by counsel" ( Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590, 591 [citation omitted]; see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. Pump Tank, 287 AD2d 497, 498). Moreover, parties seeking to set aside such a stipulation will be granted such relief only upon a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, overreaching, duress or mistake ( see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d at 230; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d at 591; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. Pump Tank, 287 AD2d at 498). Here, the plaintiffs' submissions failed to demonstrate good cause sufficient to warrant vacatur of the stipulation.
[See 13 Misc 3d 1201(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51632(U).]