It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). The contention of defendant that his plea was coerced and thus was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered "is belied by [his] statement during the plea proceeding that [he] was not threatened, coerced or otherwise influenced against [his] will into pleading guilty" ( People v Beaty, 303 AD2d 965, lv denied 100 NY2d 559; see People v Gradia, 28 AD3d 1206, 1206-1207, lv denied 7 NY3d 756). Defendant's conclusory and unsubstantiated claim of innocence also is belied by his statements during the plea proceeding ( see People v Kimmons, 39 AD3d 1180; People v Jackson, 34 AD3d 1304, lv denied 8 NY3d 846, 986). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the record reflects that his waiver of the right to appeal was the result of a knowing and voluntary choice ( see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280; People v Ludlow, 42 AD3d 941), and that waiver encompasses defendant's challenge to Supreme Court's suppression ruling ( see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833; People v Pan Zhi Feng, 15 AD3d 862, lv denied 5 NY3d 809).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.