Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANNY MAY STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. MAX WILLIAMS, STAN CZERIAK, BETTY BLAYLOCK, JOAN PALMATEER, JIM MARAS, JEAN HILL, BILL DOWMAN, G. STUART, and M.D. MILHORN Defendants.

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District JudgePage 2

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#38) on February 15, 2008, in which she recommended this Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#33). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#38). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#33).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEVENS v. WILLIAMS
(Mar 27, 2008)