JONES v. BELLINGER

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8132

Attorney(S)

Mr. W.H. Townsend, for appellants, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220. Mr. G. Duncan Bellinger, for infant appellants, cites: Infant defendants are contingent remaindermen: 10 S.C. 372, 376. On the main question: 99 Ill. 11; 97 Md. 679; 54 S.C. 513; 2 S.C. 78; 21 S.C. 530; 69 S.C. 469, 3 Metc. 155; 58 Ind. 101; 92 N.Y. 446. Mr. James H. Hammond, contra, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220; 74 Conn. 630; 76 Conn. 586; 47 Mo. 105; 4 Rich. 46; 52 S.C. 88; 85 S.C. 439; 29 Ala. 571; 4 Rich. Eq. 300; 1 At. R. 82; 172 U.S. 491; 35 S.C. 314.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8132

Attorney(S)

Mr. W.H. Townsend, for appellants, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220. Mr. G. Duncan Bellinger, for infant appellants, cites: Infant defendants are contingent remaindermen: 10 S.C. 372, 376. On the main question: 99 Ill. 11; 97 Md. 679; 54 S.C. 513; 2 S.C. 78; 21 S.C. 530; 69 S.C. 469, 3 Metc. 155; 58 Ind. 101; 92 N.Y. 446. Mr. James H. Hammond, contra, cites: Rich. Eq. Cas. 220; 74 Conn. 630; 76 Conn. 586; 47 Mo. 105; 4 Rich. 46; 52 S.C. 88; 85 S.C. 439; 29 Ala. 571; 4 Rich. Eq. 300; 1 At. R. 82; 172 U.S. 491; 35 S.C. 314.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JONES v. BELLINGER.

March 12, 1912. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE WATTS.

This is an appeal from a decree of Judge Shipp confirming in a short order the report of H.L. O'Bannon, Esq., master for Barnwell county, made in the above case. The report of master should be printed in the case.

For the reasons set out by the master in his able report we think there was no error in Judge Shipp's decree confirming the same, and adopt it as the decree and judgment of the Court, under the authorities quoted in said report and his conclusions.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

JONES v. BELLINGER.

Comments