Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael La

ORDER

JOAN ERICKSEN, District Judge

In a Report and Recommendation dated September 15, 2008, the Honorable Susan R. Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendant Nielsen's motions to suppress, Defendant Balance's motions for severance and to suppress, and Defendant O'Brien's motions to suppress be denied. Defendants objected to the recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Nielsen's Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. No. 34] is DENIED AS MOOT.
2. Nielsen's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Illegal Searches [Docket No. 35] is DENIED.
3. Nielsen's Motion to Suppress Any Identifications [Doc. No. 36] is DENIED AS MOOT.
4. Balance's Motions for Severance of Counts and Defendants [Doc. Nos. 48 and 71] are DENIED.
5. Balance's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Doc. No. 49] is DENIED
6. Balance's Motion to Suppress Confessions and Statements in the Nature of Confessions [Doc. No. 70] is DENIED.
7. O'Brien's Motion to Suppress Search and Seizure of Evidence [Doc. No. 65] is DENIED.
8. O'Brien's Motion to Suppress Confession or Statements in the Nature of Confessions [Doc. No. 66] is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. BALANCE
(Oct 6, 2008)