Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

BARBARA JEAN KONE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD LEON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on defendant District of Columbia Public Schools' motion to dismiss on the ground that it is not a suable entity. As a component of the District of Columbia government, this defendant is non sui juris. See Hinson ex rel. N.H. v. Merrit Educ. Ctr., 521 F. Supp. 2d 22, 34 (D.D.C. 2007); Kundrat v. District of Columbia, 106 F. Supp. 2d 1, 5 (D.D.C. 2000); Kelly v. Morris, 400 A.2d 1045, 1047 (D.C. 1979). However, plaintiff is proceeding pro se and, therefore, the Court liberally construes her pleadings. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Gray v. Poole, 275 F.3d 1113, 1115 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Plaintiff's complaint reasonably is construed as an employment discrimination action against her employer, the District of Columbia. The Court will deny defendant's motion and, sua sponte, will substitute the District of Columbia as the proper party defendant.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: 2/14/11

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KONE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
(Feb 16, 2011)