Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Vinod Kumar v. Smt Arti

    Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:79787

    Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5514 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- Smt Arti Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Bhan Dubey

    Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

    2. By means of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, petitioner wants expeditious disposal of Suit No.1516 of 2021 filed by petitioner under Section 13(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi.

    3. It transpires from the ordersheet that the defendant has not put in appearance despite service of summons.

    4. In the circumstances, this petition stands disposed of with following directions:

    a) The trial court shall proceed to record satisfaction regarding service through publication in a scheduled newspaper of the judgeship concerned within a period of two months of production of certified copy of this order.

    b) After recording satisfaction regarding service of summons, as directed hereinabove, the trial court shall proceed to conclude the proceedings in light of provisions as contained under Section 21-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 of-course having due regard to the provisions contained Section 9 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

    5. It is made clear that direction for expeditious disposal of proceedings of divorce will not adversely affect any misc. application pending before the court concerned under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and that shall be first disposed of within 30 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if pending.

    6. It is, however, clarified that in the event trial court is not able to decide the suit for any technical reason, such delay in disposal of the suit and pendency thereof shall ordinarily not be a ground sufficient enough to fasten the officer concerned with any personal liability of contempt.

    Order Date :- 3.5.2024 P Kesari

      1. 2024-05-08T17:26:56+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Vinod Kumar v. Smt Arti
    (May 3, 2024)