AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sect. 33 Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, (Act IX of 1887)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sect. 33 Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, (Act IX of 1887)

    Bhuvanapalli Subbayya v. Rajah Velugoti Govinda Krishna Yachendra Varu Raja Of Venkatagiri

    This suit to recover arrears of Kattubadi of less than Rs. 500 in amount is of a small cause nature and no Second Appeal lies (see Mullapudi Balakrishnayya v. Venkatanarasimha Appa Rau.

    The appellant's vakil asks us to hold that the District Munsif had no jurisdiction to try the suit on the original side seeing that under Sect. 33 Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, (Act IX of 1887) he is deemed to be a different Court from the same Court exercising Small Cause jurisdiction, and suggests that we should interfere in revision and send the suit back for retrial on the Small Cause side.

    In this case, unlike the cases dealt within Kollipara Seetapathy v. Kankipati Subbayya, Davlatsinhji (Maharana Shri) v. Khachar Hamir Mon there was no reversal of the 1st Court's decree in appeal, and therefore no equity arises in the defendant's favour, to have the Lower Appellate Court's decree set aside and get the case retried by the same Original Court in a less formal manner than it has already tried it. We must decline to interfere in the manner suggested seeing that the defendant has not been prejudiced by the course adopted by the District Munsif.

    We dismiss this Second Appeal with costs.

    S. S.Appeal dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Bhuvanapalli Subbayya v. Rajah Velugoti Govinda Krishna Yachendra Varu Raja Of Venkatagiri
    (Jan 4, 1921)