All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
US
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
United Kingdom
England and Wales
Scotland
Northern Ireland
Ireland
55 Pa. Code § 178.105 : HUMAN SERVICES — PUBLIC ASSISTANCE MANUAL — DETERMINATION OF NEED AND AMOUNT OF ASSISTANCE — Resource Provisions for Categorically NMP-MA and MNO-MA — AGED, BLIND AND DISABLED CATEGORIES OF MA —DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY AND FAIR CONSIDERATION PROVISIONS FOR THE AGED, BLIND AND DISABLED CATEGORIES OF MA — Presumption of disposition of assets to qualify for MA for transfers on or after July 30, 1994
Text
(a)
If a presumption of disposition of assets to qualify for MA is made by the Department, the individual will be notified in writing by the CAO of the finding and of the right to rebut this presumption within 15 days from the date the notice is mailed.
(b)
If the individual does not respond to the notice within 15 days from the date it is mailed, the CAO will complete the application/reapplication for MA using the UV as an asset available to the individual over the applicable look-back period from the date of the transfer of the asset and the total assets will be determined on that basis.
(c)
If the individual responds to the written notice within 15 days from the date it was mailed that he wishes to rebut the presumption, the CAO shall explain to the individual that it is his responsibility to present within 10 calendar days the required verification and convincing evidence that the assets were transferred solely for some purpose other than to qualify for MA. Convincing evidence includes documentary and nondocumentary evidence which provides proof of the circumstances surrounding the transfer, including the following:
(1)
The purpose for transferring the asset.
(2)
The attempts to dispose of the asset at its FMV.
(3)
The reasons for accepting less than FMV of the asset.
(4)
The means of, or plans for, self-support after the transfer.
(5)
The individual's relationship to the person to whom the asset was transferred.
(d)
If the evidence is received within the 10 calendar day period established in subsection (c), a decision on the success of the rebuttal of the individual will be made. If the establishment of MA eligibility is determined to be part of the reason for the transfer, even if another purpose has also been established, the asset was not transferred solely for some purpose other than to qualify for MA and the rebuttal is not successful. The presumption is rebutted only if the individual proves that the transfer was solely for some purpose other than to qualify for MA such as:
(1)
If after the transfer of the asset, the individual either becomes disabled or has an unexpected loss of assets and this results in the need to apply for MA the presumption is rebutted. The unanticipated disability or unexpected loss of assets shall be verified.
(2)
If the assets of the individual would still have been below the income and resource limits for the appropriate MA Program during each of the months in the period of ineligibility which would otherwise apply under §
178.104(d)
(relating to disposition of assets and fair consideration provisions for transfers on or after July 30, 1994), had the asset been retained, the presumption is rebutted. The individual shall provide verification of the asset value during the period in question.
(3)
If the transfer was the result of a court order or written settlement of a legal action, the presumption is rebutted. A copy of the court order or written settlement is required.
(e)
The determination of whether the presumption is rebutted is made by the executive director of the CAO or a delegate. The individual is given written notice of the determination and of the right to appeal.
(f)
If the presumption is rebutted, the transfer has no effect on the MA eligibility determination.
(g)
If the presumption is not rebutted, it is presumed that the asset transferred was for the purpose of qualifying for MA and the following apply:
(1)
The UV is considered an asset for 36 or 60 months, as applicable, from the date on which the individual is both an institutionalized individual and has applied for MA.
(2)
The UV is added to other assets that are considered. If the total exceeds the MA income or resource limits in Appendix A or Chapter 181 Appendix B, for the appropriate MA Program, the individual is not eligible for MA.
(3)
If the transferred asset is returned to the individual, the UV is not considered an asset as of the date the transferred asset was returned. If the transferred asset is cash or liquid assets, the UV is reduced by the value of the asset that was returned.
(4)
A returned asset is evaluated as an asset.
(5)
Additional compensation received in the form of cash after the transfer of the asset further reduces the UV by the amount of cash received as of the date the cash was received.
55 Pa. Code § 178.105
×
We use cookies to improve your experience
You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.
Cancel Analytical Cookies
Accept All Cookies