All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
20 C.F.R. § 404.911 : Employees' Benefits — SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION — FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) — DETERMINATIONS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS, AND REOPENING OF DETERMINATIONS AND DECISIONS —RECONSIDERATION — Good cause for missing the deadline to request review
Text
(a)
In determining whether you have shown that you had good cause for missing a deadline to request review we consider-
(1)
What circumstances kept you from making the request on time;
(2)
Whether our action misled you;
(3)
Whether you did not understand the requirements of the Act resulting from amendments to the Act, other legislation, or court decisions; and
(4)
Whether you had any physical, mental, educational, or linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) which prevented you from filing a timely request or from understanding or knowing about the need to file a timely request for review.
(b)
Examples of circumstances where good cause may exist include, but are not limited to, the following situations:
(1)
You were seriously ill and were prevented from contacting us in person, in writing, or through a friend, relative, or other person.
(2)
There was a death or serious illness in your immediate family.
(3)
Important records were destroyed or damaged by fire or other accidental cause.
(4)
You were trying very hard to find necessary information to support your claim but did not find the information within the stated time periods.
(5)
You asked us for additional information explaining our action within the time limit, and within 60 days of receiving the explanation you requested reconsideration or a hearing, or within 30 days of receiving the explanation you requested Appeal Council review or filed a civil suit.
(6)
We gave you incorrect or incomplete information about when and how to request administrative review or to file a civil suit.
(7)
You did not receive notice of the determination or decision.
(8)
You sent the request to another Government agency in good faith within the time limit and the request did not reach us until after the time period had expired.
(9)
Unusual or unavoidable circumstances exist, including the circumstances described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, which show that you could not have known of the need to file timely, or which prevented you from filing timely.
20 C.F.R. §404.911
45 FR 52081, 8/5/1980, as amended at 59 FR 1634, 1/12/1994
×