Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Nieto v. Strigenz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

EDWARD NIETO,

Plaintiff, vs. THOMAS P. STRIGENZ,

Defendant.

8:25CV9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On April 22, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to update his address with the Court

within 30 days or face dismissal of this action. Filing No. 12. To date, Plaintiff has not

updated his address or taken any other action in this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice

because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this Court’s

orders. The Court will enter judgment by a separate document.

Dated this 2nd day of June, 2025.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Court

8:25-cv-00009-JFB-PRSE Doc # 15 Filed: 06/02/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # <pageID>

    1. Superintendent of Documents
    2. 2025-06-03T15:43:45-0400
    3. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office
    5. Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Nieto v. Strigenz
(Jun 2, 2025)