AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHRISTOPHER ANDERSEN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Party in Interest.

Pickering

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or a writ of mandamus. Petitioner Christopher Andersen argues that the district court erroneously denied his appeal challenging the municipal court's denial of a demand for a jury trial for a misdemeanor domestic battery offense. Recognizing that the right to a jury trial exists only for serious offenses, see Blanton v. North Las Vegas Mun. Ct., 103 Nev. 623, 748 P.2d 494 (1987), aff'd sub nom. Blanton v. North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989), Andersen argues, among other things, that misdemeanor domestic battery is a serious offense because it results in the lifetime prohibition of gun possession pursuant to federal and state law.

Andersen has submitted an insufficient appendix for this court's review of the district court's decision. Notably, the appendix is missing the judgment and documents related to the appeal (briefs, the district court's order, and transcripts). See NRAP 21(a)(4) ("The appendix shall include a copy of any order or opinion, parts of the record before the respondent judge . . . or any other original document that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition."). Without the necessary documents for this court's review, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that a petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that whether to consider a writ petition is within this court's discretion). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.


Pickering /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Hardesty cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge



The Pariente Law Firm, P.C.


Attorney General/Carson City


Las Vegas City Attorney


Eighth District Court Clerk

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Andersen v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State
(Feb 15, 2018)