Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

LANCASTER COUNTY, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner. AFSCME District Council 89, Inter

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, No. 105 MAL 2012.

Prior report: Pa.Cmwlth., 35 A.3d 73.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.


AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED.

The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Board interpret the Public Employee Relations Act in a clearly erroneous manner by concluding that prison maintenance employees who supervise inmates on prison grounds outside the prison walls are prison guards for purposes of bargaining unit placement under the Act?

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Lancaster Cnty. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.
(Apr 30, 2013)