AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Jeanne Marie Scott, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Col

PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN

JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN
Memorandum of Opinion and Order

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh (Doc. 23), recommending that the Court award attorney fees in the amount of $4,350.00, of which $350 is for costs. No objections have been filed. For the reasons that follow, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and attorney fees in the amount of $4,350.00 (of which $350 is costs) shall be awarded to plaintiff and sent to plaintiff in care of her counsel.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When objections are made to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the case de novo. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides in pertinent part:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.


As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes, "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." In Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985), the Court held, "It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings."

DECISION

This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby awards attorney fees in the amount of $4,350.00 (of which $350 is costs) to plaintiff. The awards shall be sent to plaintiff in care of her counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________


PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Scott v. Colvin
(Jul 7, 2014)