AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph MILLS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Joseph N. Schneiderman on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed March 16, 2011, which, upon his convictions of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed periods of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on January 14, 2000.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Algarin, 89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 358).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. SKELOS, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BELEN, LOTT and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Mills
(Dec 27, 2011)