Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. RUTLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v. THE STATE TAX COMMISSION, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. S. TAX COMM
(Jun 8, 1926)