AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EUREKA CEREAL BEVERAGE CO., Inc., v. PENNINGTON, Prohibition Adm'r, et al.

PER CURIAM.

Apart from the failure of the plaintiff in this bill to make the commissioner a party [see opinion of this court in Chamberlain v. Lembeck, 18 F.2d 408], the year covered by the permit here involved had expired before this case was argued before this court, and the questions involved were then academic.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EUREKA CEREAL BEVERAGE CO. v. PENNINGTON
(Aug 16, 1933)