AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAX L. STEGMAN, APPELLANT, v. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OFNEW JERSEY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 11.

For dismissal — CASE, PERSKIE, JJ. 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEGMAN v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE
(Jan 22, 1937)