Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Elmer E. Batzell, Washington, D.C. for appellant. Mr. Norman L. Meyers, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. John F. Cotter, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Assistant Attorney General A. Devitt Vanech was on the brief, for appellees. Messrs. Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellees.
Judges
  • Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
  • James McPherson Proctor
  • David L. Bazelon
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Elmer E. Batzell, Washington, D.C. for appellant. Mr. Norman L. Meyers, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. John F. Cotter, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Assistant Attorney General A. Devitt Vanech was on the brief, for appellees. Messrs. Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellees.
Judges
  • Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
  • James McPherson Proctor
  • David L. Bazelon
See more information ...
Smart Summary

BURNHAM CHEMICAL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Oscar L. CHAPMAN, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This action against the Secretary of the Interior was to require him to grant the appellant's application for a prospecting permit on certain lands located in what is known as the Kramer Borax District in California. Burnham Chemical Company appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which dismissed its complaint.

The opinion of the district judge, reported in 81 F. Supp. 911, seems to us to demonstrate the soundness of his conclusion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BURNHAM CHEMICAL COMPANY v. CHAPMAN
(Mar 6, 1950)