Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Curtis P. Mitchell and DeLong Harris, Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Lewis A. Carroll, and John D. Lane, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. E. Riley Casey, Asst. U.S. Atty., and William R. Glendon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed entered appearances in No. 11809. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance in No. 11809 and No. 11846.
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • David L. Bazelon
  • George Thomas Washington
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Curtis P. Mitchell and DeLong Harris, Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Lewis A. Carroll, and John D. Lane, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. E. Riley Casey, Asst. U.S. Atty., and William R. Glendon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed entered appearances in No. 11809. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance in No. 11809 and No. 11846.
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • David L. Bazelon
  • George Thomas Washington
See more information ...
Smart Summary

SHAY v. UNITED STATES. BROWN

PER CURIAM.

Of the several contentions raised on these appeals, the only one that would otherwise require discussion relates to the form and execution of search warrants and is answered by Ledbetter v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. ___, 211 F.2d 628. As we held in that case, D.C. Code 1951 § 23-301 need not be complied with when Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [28 U.S.C.A.] is complied with.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SHAY v. UNITED STATES
(Feb 19, 1954)