Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SANGER ET AL., APPELLEES v. SEIDEN ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Attorney fees — Suit for — Fair trial — Claimed abuse of discretion.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SANGER v. SEIDEN
(Jan 14, 1959)