Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal Court — Vacation of judgment taken by warrant of attorney — Defense of prior jurisdiction by Court of Common Pleas — How raised — Availability — Claimed abuse of discretion — Sections 1 and 19, Article I, Constitution — Inviolability of private property.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.