Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SUSMAN, APPELLANT v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Zoning — Refusal to permit motor vehicle wrecking or dismantling on premises — Previously used to store salvaged lumber and used building materials — Claim substitution of nonconforming uses — Evidence — Sections 1, 16 and 19, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Due process.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUSMAN v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL
(Jun 1, 1960)