Telephone companies — Rates for concentrator-identifier equipment — Burden on complainant to prove unreasonable and excessive — Evidence insufficient to support claim.
Per Curiam.
This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.
Order affirmed.
TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.