Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LESTER WELLS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MACE BROWN, DEFENDANT, ANDUNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Licata v. Lutz, 48 N.J. 255 (1966), decided today, the judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WELLS v. BROWN
(Dec 5, 1966)