Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUSSELL CRANE et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No. 47684.)

Per Curiam.

Application is made here to vacate the order of this court dismissing an appeal for failure to prosecute. While counsel for the litigants are accorded powers of management of appeals in this court to the limited extent now provided in rule 500.6 (b) (22 N.Y.CRR 500.6 [b]) (the so-called 20-day rule), the consent or acquiescence of opposing counsel will not relieve a defaulting party from the strictures of the nine months' requirement of rule 500.6 (a) (22 N.Y.CRR 500.6 [a]). In this instance, the notice of appeal was dated May 23, 1968. The fact that counsel for respondent may now be willing to participate in argument of the appeal affords no ground for vacatur of the order of dismissal entered November 6, 1974.

Accordingly the motion is denied.

Motion to vacate an order of dismissal of the Court of Appeals, dated November 6, 1974, denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRANE v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Dec 20, 1974)