Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN TIMOTHY EDMOND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. F. DE LA ROSA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

The district court judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated therein with one modification. We modify the dismissal to ABATE that portion of appellants' claim that challenges his loss of good time and S-3 status. The district court erred in construing Texas law to toll the statute of limitations on a prisoner's § 1983 action during his confinement. See Winton v. Burton, 582 F. Supp. 1044 (E.D.Tex. 1984), citing Johnson v. McLean, 630 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App. 1982, no writ).

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EDMOND v. DE LA ROSA
(Jan 4, 1988)