Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL COLE, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

The court should have granted the defendant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds (CPL 30.30). Defendant's motion challenged the People's assertion of readiness as illusory because they were unable to produce the complainant. The sworn allegations of fact essential to support defendant's motion were conceded by the People when they failed to submit opposition papers contesting these allegations (People v Gruden, 42 N.Y.2d 214). Under these circumstances the court is required by statute to grant the motion (CPL 210.45 [c]; see also, People v Gonzalez, 116 A.D.2d 735).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLE
(Mar 30, 1989)