Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM J. OBERPRILLER, APPELLANT, v. FRED M. DELLAPA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court ruling. We note that the appellant asserts he did not receive notice of the final hearing in a matrimonial action until long after the hearing had been held. Assuming these facts are established to the satisfaction of the trial court which heard the matrimonial action, by affidavit or testimony, the appellant would be entitled to relief from judgment in the dissolution proceeding. See, e.g., Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 467 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant's ability to seek relief from judgment in the matrimonial action.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OBERPRILLER v. DELLAPA
(Feb 13, 1990)