Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MEADOWS, APPELLANT.

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

MOYER, C.J., HOLMES, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MEADOWS
(Mar 4, 1992)