INDUSTRIAL DEV. v. COMMERCIAL UNION, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Robert H. Tell argued the cause for appellant ( Lynch, Martin, Philibosian Chansky, attorneys). Glenn A. Bergenfield argued the cause for respondent ( Chazkel Bergenfield, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., A/K/A INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTASSOCIATION, A NEW JERSEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COMMERCIAL UNION SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATEOF DELAWARE; EXECUTIVE EXCESS LTD.; ANTONIO SUAREZ, D/B/A I.C.P.; ASSOCIATEDFINANCIAL SERVICES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; P.P.G. INDUSTRIES, INC., ACORPORATION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND PUGLIESE SWIMMING POOLSCORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS, AND F.T.P., INC., ACORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio's opinion, reported at 248 N.J. Super. 468, 591 A.2d 682 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.