Defendant's sentence was properly executed. His due process rights were not violated since he was not entitled to counsel at the execution of sentence, which is "not a critical stage of the * * * criminal proceeding" ( People v. Harris, 79 N.Y.2d 909, 910).
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Although the identification procedure was "police-arranged" in the sense that the complainant was escorted by detectives to the area where the crime occurred for the purpose of trying to find the assailants, such that a hearing was properly granted ( People v. Dixon, 85 N.Y.2d 218, 223), the actual identification was not the product of any suggestiveness by police, and indeed was entirely spontaneous and unprompted.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.