Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMELIA NASH and FRED NASH, her husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BELLALERNER, Defendant-Appellant, and JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, and RICHARDROES, Defendants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J. Super. 183, 193 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.

POLLOCK, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell's majority opinion, reported at 311 N.J. Super. 183 (1998).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NASH v. LERNER
(Mar 17, 1999)